By the way, on a personal level, I consider every film worth watching. That’s because movies are a mirror of society. Sometimes we do not consider the mirror as part of the society and start to understand the whole society, so they spread. She may be pointing to a particular time of a society, a particular aspect, a problem, a disease and a particular angle, but the films brought its raw materials are from within the society itself. Whether we agree or not.
Acne and stains are visible on the face in the glass, because the man standing outside the glass has really pimples and deep pimples. Yes, if this man was standing in front of the mirror applying makeup foundation and concealer, then the mirror would have shown a bright face. Many films take care of this … presenting with denting-painting. Many films want to be seen as they are. Even if you do a lot of triangles in it, then she makes the face become more squid, and then gets stuck in reverse. Many films take safe passages and the coolies descend like number one. Even if you become a mahabor upon seeing them, do not think of heating their temple. These films earn money by becoming adorable.
The thing on Tandava should be that if a large part of the story was introduced in the season first by being allegedly ‘inspired’ by JNU’s past controversies, but in a very useless manner. If there is a brick somewhere, in the first season itself, then in the second season, the Hindustani web series is vigorous anyway. It is just like that if the elder daughter is white, tall and fast in sports, the younger daughter, the daughter topped in studies is not able to live under the burden of expectations and cost and she could not do what she could. In the first episode, staging of Hindu deities was unnecessary. Recent Twitter controversies and political upbringing brought about religion would not have been shown in a funny tone, but then it is a writerly freedom. The camel would turn on one side or the other. The poems and writings of Gaurav Solanki, who has written brilliant films like article 15, are both sharp and naked. Do not like what you like but true. It has also appeared in the writing of this film. The film’s direction and acting is very weak because everything is scattered and this is one reason why the Hindu-Muslim angle seems to be more outspoken. Since it is visible, it is beating.
Caste commentaries have been called from Tigmanshu Dhulia and Dino Morea, but it is not that this thinking and such commentary comments are not part of the conversation in your society. Actually, it is not an insult to the Dalit society that such a call has been given in this film, but rather it is thought that even today it is thought and said. In this same cultural society, even today, a Dalit youth has been persecuted for buying a bike. And, in the absence of a caste surname, the caste is asked (sometimes straight). Goya, did not go ‘Did the hand sanitize?’ You are being asked So what is the complaint, on speaking what it is like or what it is!
Well, the ground of protest has given such things in the film. Some days will remain in discussions. If you have not seen and there is no shortage of time, then eat the melody and know yourself.